As I mentioned in my recent Midpoints book, as we analyze a horoscope: 

"...we continue to figuratively build upon the basic skeleton of the horoscope as we add successive layers of symbolic nerves, muscles, and connective tissue. Gradually an impression of the complete individual begins to emerge rather than just a grocery list of unconnected bits and pieces. And while each measurement has its own merits, a much more useful and specific interpretation is possible when we are able to integrate these seemingly disparate components. Without this integration, the numerous fragments of individual measurements can lead us toward confusion rather than enlightenment."

While each individual measurement has a specific range of possibilities and expectations associated with it, only when we assess multiple measurements in tandem are we able to form a reasonable scenario of an overall interpretation.

As we proceed through our analysis, we take note of the individual interpretations and construct a virtual scorecard that identifies similar, overlapping, or reinforcing themes.  These repetitive themes merit our attention as they increasingly emphasize probable influences.

The more consistent and congruous our observations are, the more likely they are to represent influential factors in the client's life.

Coupled with the network of related measurements, we can also gain tremendous insight and increase the detail of our expectations by listening carefully to the client's responses to our suggestions and assessments.  Based on the specific response, we are often drawn to look back at the chart as we seek out specific corroborating data that will confirm, validate, or add strength to our impressions.

As we evaluate our cumulative assessment, we continue to formulate an increasingly reasonable scenario that both summarizes multiple measurements and also fits into the real life circumstances and life direction of the client.

Often, in my weekly class of advanced astrology students, I encourage the students to formulate a reasonable scenario that fits in with the observed measurements from the chart.  it's as if we're outlining a fictional biography of the person.  This exercise allows us to consolidate our analysis while keeping in mind the polarities of expression of each measurement.  Each successive measurement modifies and allows us to fine-tune our expectations.

Each measurement is limited in its potential scope of influence—but when we creatively combine cumulative measurements into a reasonable scenario, it becomes much easier to meld diverse factors together and see the bigger picture.

May 2004

Sep. 2004

Oct. 2004

Nov. 2004

Dec. 2004

Jan. 2005

Feb. 2005

Mar. 2005