Every
astrologer has their own way of approaching natal chart analysis. We
may include something that other astrologers don't consider, or weight
certain factors differently than others might. For
me, one of the measurements that I always take into consideration and
weight relatively heavily is the closest aspect in the natal chart.
Those
of you who have read my book, Midpoints, know that I'm a bit
of a fanatic when it comes to orbs. I strongly believe that the
closer an aspect is to being exact, the more potent the interaction
between the two planets or points. Taken to the point of absurdity,
an aspect that is precisely exact to the minute undeniably represents a
stronger link than the same aspect that is 15 degrees away from
being exact.
We
theoretically couldand
in fact some software packages actually docreate
a hierarchical list of all aspects that list the closest aspects
first. Even for someone such as myself with Saturn in Virgo, this is
a little over the topin common parlance,
"too much information". But, however, I believe that the aspect at
the very top of the list (i.e., the one closest to being exact) deserves
and should be awarded some
extra attention.
We
can also determine the closest aspect by looking at the aspect grid where
the form displays not only the aspect but the distance it is away from
being exact. The example used in the earlier series of articles
analyzing the aspect grid (Part I, Part
II, Part III, and Part
IV) is shown below:
Next
to
each aspect symbol in the grid we see an "a" that indicates that
the aspect is getting closer (applying or approaching)
or an "s" that indicates that the aspect is getting
further away (separating)
from being exact. As we determine the closest aspect it doesn't
matter whether the aspect is applying or separating, but rather
the absolute distance from being exact.**
We
can then methodically look at the listings beneath each aspect and find the one
that is closest to 00 Degrees 00 Minutes.
In
the example above, as the
closest aspect in the grid, Saturn forms a Quindecile (a
165
degree aspect within just 4 minutes of being exact) with Mercury, suggesting a
compelling need for thoughts, ideas, and communications to be clearly
presented. A secondary, health-related interpretation may represent a
vulnerability to depression.
Which
aspects you consider is a matter of personal preference, but I suggest you
restrict your considerations to the aspects that you normally use.
Personally, I use the major (Ptolemaic aspects - conjunction, opposition,
square, trine, and sextile), as well as some select minor
aspects (quincunx, semisquare, sesquiquadrate, quintile, and
quindecile). The closest aspect you would select would be chosen
from the aspects that you normally use...and the closest one being
selected without regard to whether it is a major or a minor aspect.
Once
this closest aspect is identified, I assign it a significantly greater
importance than otherwise. On some occasions, there may be a tie
between two (or more aspects) for the honor of the closest aspect.
In these cases, I assign an amplifiedbut equalimportance
to each.
Next
month, we'll look at some specific examples of the closest aspect in some
famous charts.
**
In fact some astrologers do alter their general orb
considerations, allowing a wider orb when an aspect is applying than when it
is separating.