Frequently, when people are first exposed
to astrology they may be rather hesitant, saying they're not sure if they
really "believe" (or should "believe") in
astrology.
First of all, it's perfectly normal to be
skeptical about things that we haven't yet explored until we can see if
they fit into our personal way of thinking. Some astrologers began
as skeptics. In fact, some actually began their study of astrology
in order to disprove it. It's not uncommon for those
attempting to disprove astrology to evolve into strong supporters.
At one end of the human spectrum are the
professional skeptics. These folks have a right to their opinions
just as everyone else does. I am offended, however, when they insist
that everyone else share their beliefs or when they
dismiss out-of-hand that astrology (or whatever) is totally without
merit and anybody that uses it is either gullible or a huckster intent on
victimizing the gullible without ever having objectively examined it.
Let me state unequivocally that I don't
attempt to persuade anyone that my views about astrology (or religion or
politics for that matter) are the only reasonable ones. These
individual "beliefs" are what make the human species interesting. I
respect each individual's right to form his/her own opinions about these
issues. Actually, I feel that individuals have a responsibility
to themselves to form their own opinions without being
force-fed any information by anyone.
If we objectively examine astrology,
we will eventually come to a conclusion whether or not it is helpful to
us. If it is, we're likely to embrace it, continue our exploration,
and want to refine how we incorporate it into our lives. If not, we will either dismiss it or decide to further
evaluate it before finalizing our opinion.
It's important to understand that astrology
really isn't a belief system. It isn't necessary to
"believe" in it in order to evaluate whether you feel it may be
useful in your life.
What is necessary, however, is to go beyond
the "Sun-sign" columns in the daily papers or monthly magazines
as we do our evaluation. Necessarily generalized and brief, these snippets are
sometimes amusing or entertaining, but rarely of any real help in our
lives.
So reasonably, you might ask, "How
should I evaluate
whether astrology has the potential to be helpful to me?"
 |
I respectfully suggest
that you begin by observing the Moon phases (in particular the days on or
around the New and Full Moon), watching how you and those around you may
have heightened sensitivities or be more susceptible to mood
changes.
Many newspapers and calendars have the Moon phases listed. Often, this relatively simple exercise can help
us begin to understand the potential uses of astrology. For example,
if we are scheduling a meeting likely to evoke strong emotional responses,
perhaps it would be wise to schedule it at a time other than close to a
full or new Moon.
Many people, like myself, who have been
associated with the health care field are well aware of the connection of the
full Moon and the numbers of babies delivered or of psychiatric trauma
cases.
|
 |
You might also choose to evaluate
events during a Mercury
Retrograde period, noticing the frequency with which communications go
awry, computers and mechanical failures occur, people lock their keys
inside their cars, etc. You can easily make these observations without a
major time commitment as you begin to evaluate for yourself the effects of
astrology.
|
 |
Certainly, the best way to determine
how astrology can be of help to you is to schedule a
private session with a reputable astrologer. By
pursuing this course of action, you can be made aware of specifics
suggestions from your chart interpretation that may be of immediate, practical use to
you.
By becoming aware of the cyclic nature of astrology and
anticipation of upcoming events, you may well decide that you want to use
astrology in your life as an adjunct to common sense and practical
planning. For additional information, you may want to check out
What you should (and
shouldn't) expect from an astrologer in the archives of this Web site. |