One of my recent
clients was intrigued by the fact that her Sun-sign horoscope seemed to be
considerably more accurate than she would have expected.
These Sun-Sign based columns consider only the position
of the Sun at the time of our birth. This is done because there is
little variation in the Sun position from year to year on any specific
date. This allows the person writing the column to anticipate
general influences since every person born on a specific date will have
their Sun at roughly the same position regardless of the year of
their birth.
So we've narrowed the entire population into twelve
distinct groups, and when Austin Powers or anyone else asks, "What's
your Sign, baby?", the real question is, "What Zodiac sign was
the Sun in when you were born?" Since virtually everyone knows
the date of their birth, we can easily determine the correct answer.
People born "on the cusp" may show tendencies of two adjacent
Signs (please see What does it mean to
be born "on the cusp"? for
more information).
If we were to isolate the single most influential
component of an individual's Horoscope, most astrologers would
certainly select the Sun. Representing how we need to use our energy
in the pursuit of our life purpose, this really comes as no big
surprise.
But there are other planets and points that are also
important in their own way... So what about them? Well, yes they are
very important, too. But that daily or weekly publication can't
realistically address the complexities of specific Horoscopes. There
just isn't enough room.
So, returning to my client's question, "Why is the
daily/weekly horoscope more consistently accurate for some
people?" This particular client was a "Triple Virgo",
meaning that her Sun, Moon, and Ascendant were all in the astrological
sign of Virgo at the time of her birth. (Please refer to my
article What does the term
"double Scorpio" mean? for
additional explanation). These
three elements are integral to who we are, with the Moon representing our
emotional needs, and the Ascendant (also known as the Rising Sign)
suggesting how we present ourselves to others. This particular
client also had her Mercury in Virgo, representing how she needed to
think. This really helps to explain why she felt that the
"Horoscopes" were often pretty accurate. Come to think of
it, having all that stuff in Virgo (particularly her Mercury) probably
prompted her to ask the question in the first place!
Granted, most of us don't have this sort of unified
focus on a specific Sign More often we see a more diverse
involvement of the Signs and, in general, less consistent correlation with
our Sun-Sign Horoscopes.
In order to accurately evaluate any individual, the
position of all the Planets and Points and their relationships to one
another need to be considered. This is the role of the astrologer --
to take the interpretation beyond a one-size-fits-all generality to a
tailor-made, integrated analysis of the whole individual.